Data study · updated Sep 1, 2026

The State of Startup Accelerators in 2026

We track 3,133 accelerator programs in 105 countries — and we ping every program's website monthly. 669 are gone. This census covers how many accelerators actually exist, where they die, and what the survivors charge. Every number below is computed from the same public dataset that powers this site.

3,133
Programs tracked
21%
Dead websites (3,133 checked Sep 1, 2026)
105
Countries
6%
Median equity taken (where disclosed)
Key findings — free to cite with a link
  • 3,133 accelerator programs tracked across 105 countries — the largest openly browsable accelerator dataset.
  • 21% of accelerator websites (669 of 3,133 checked) are dead — offline, parked, or gone.
  • Accelerators founded 2015–2020 have died at 24%, vs 14% for programs founded 2000–2009.
  • New-accelerator launches peaked around 2016 and have collapsed since.
  • Median equity taken: 6% (of 344 programs that disclose terms). 49 programs are equity-free.
  • Median disclosed investment: $50K. Median program length: 4 months.
  • 59% of programs run hybrid, 35% in person, 7% fully remote.

1 in 5 accelerators is gone

On Sep 1, 2026 we requested every one of the 3,133 accelerator websites in our directory. 669 (21%) no longer resolve, return errors, or are parked domains. Another 258 block automated checks, so their status is unknown.

■ Live — 2,206 (70%) ■ Dead — 669 (21%) ■ Blocked our checker — 258 (8%)

Most directories keep listing programs long after they shut down — a dead accelerator rarely announces it. This is why the widely repeated “7,000+ accelerators worldwide” figure should be treated with suspicion: no living public dataset backs it, and among programs we can actually verify, a fifth are already gone. Dead programs stay in our directory labeled as dead, because founders deserve to know both.

Where accelerators die

Share of accelerator websites now dead, for every country where we track at least 50 programs:

Australia
38% of 60
Netherlands
29% of 56
India
27% of 127
United Kingdom
25% of 204
Germany
24% of 123
Singapore
23% of 52
France
20% of 98
United States
18% of 1,125
Italy
17% of 54
Spain
15% of 99
Canada
14% of 139
Japan
12% of 50

The spread is wide: Australia (38%) has roughly 3× the dead-rate of Japan (12%). Ecosystems that expanded fastest in the mid-2010s — often on time-limited government or corporate funding — are shedding the most programs now.

The launch boom is over

Founding year of the programs in our dataset. Launches accelerated through the 2010s, peaked around 2016, and fell off sharply after 2019:

2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020

Note: the most recent years are undercounted — new programs typically enter directories a year or two after launching. The post-2019 decline is real, but its exact depth is uncertain; see methodology.

Younger accelerators die faster

You might expect the oldest programs to have died at the highest rate — they've had the longest to fail. The opposite is true:

Founded 2000–2009
14% of 406
Founded 2010–2014
21% of 1,010
Founded 2015–2020
24% of 1,471

Programs that survived the 2000s were built to last — many are institutions today. The 2015–2020 launch wave, by contrast, includes hundreds of thinly funded corporate and government initiatives that quietly stopped operating within a few years. Survivorship, not safety, explains the veterans' better numbers.

What the survivors charge

Terms are the least-disclosed fact in the industry: only 344 of 3,133 programs (11%) publish an equity percentage at all. Among those that do, the median is 6%, and 49 programs take no equity — mostly university- and government-backed.

Investment amounts are similar: 121 programs disclose a cheque, with a median of $50K — far below the headline $500K deals of the top brand-name accelerators. The median program runs 4 months (1,134 disclose a duration), and of programs with a known format, 59% are hybrid, 35% in person, and 7% fully remote.

Who's actually accepting applications

Of the programs whose application status we've verified against their own websites this year: 201 open, 333 rolling admissions, and 178 closed between cohorts — 68 with a published deadline.

The live list, re-checked monthly: accelerators with open applications →

Methodology

The underlying directory has been compiled since 2023 from program websites, ecosystem lists, and submissions, and is continuously extended. On Sep 1, 2026 we ran an automated HTTP sweep of all 3,133 program websites (following redirects). “Dead” means the domain no longer resolves, returns a server error, or is parked; “blocked” means the site refused automated requests, so we make no claim about it. 1,915 program records additionally carry a human- or AI-verified review of their published details in 2026.

Disclosure-based stats (equity, cheque, duration) are computed only over programs that publish the figure, with the sample size stated inline — treat them as “among programs that disclose,” not industry-wide truths. Founding-year counts undercount recent years, since new programs enter directories with a lag. Spot an error? Tell us — we correct fast.

Cite this study

All figures are free to reuse with attribution:

Source: startersss, “The State of Startup Accelerators in 2026” — startersss.com/state-of-startup-accelerators

Or explore the data yourself: the full directory of 3,133 programs, browse by country, or open applications.